Archive for the ‘Constitutional Rights’ Category

Innocent Until Proven Guilty: What does this really mean?

Jesse, on the topic of  Constitutional Rights, Legal Process, Utah Law
0comment

Photo: Ann Althouse

Our criminal justice system is based upon the idea that a person is innocent until proven guilty.  Until a jury decides whether they believe you are guilty or innocent, the law treats you as an innocent person.  During your trial, the prosecution has the burden of proof to convince a jury that you are guilty.  The belief behind this system is that if the government is going to take away your liberty, they must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that you in fact committed the crime.  If they cannot prove you are guilty, you are allowed to keep your liberty.  That is the way the system is supposed to work.

Unfortunately, the system isn’t that perfect.  When the news reports that a person allegedly committed a crime, most viewers automatically assume that the person is guilty.  If the newspaper reports on a teacher who is accused of having sex with his students, people assume that the teacher is guilty.

Even though our criminal justice system is based on “innocent until proven guilty,” the general public always rushes to judgment.  During jury selection, the judge or lawyers will usually ask, “Does anyone believe that because a person is arrested and charged with a crime, they probably committed that crime?”  Potential jurors often raise their hands.  As a defendant, you wouldn’t want that kind of person on the jury deciding your future.

Because the general public has a difficult time with the concept of “innocent until proven guilty,” it is critical that you hire an attorney who can explain this concept to juries.  If your attorney can prove that the prosecution cannot prove guilt, then you will be found innocent.

Falsely Accused of being a Utah Gang Member?

Jesse, on the topic of  Constitutional Rights, Utah Law
0comment

Photo: vabellon

Wearing certain clothing, being in a certain place, or being of a certain racial minority could possibly identify you as a gang member to police.  Seems unfair?  It is.  And during the 2009 Utah Legislative session, lawmakers made it easier for police to arrest innocent racial minorities for standing in the wrong place for too long and accuse them of being a member of a gang.

Senate Bill 16 (which was passed and is now law), sponsored by Senator Jon Griener (who is the Odgen City Police Chief), allows police officers to confront a group of people and tell them to disperse.  The only requirements are that the police officer must “reasonably believe” that the group includes at least one gang member and the area where people are in is a “gang area.”  There is no limitation on how big the “area” can be, so a “gang area” could be the entire city of West Valley.

If you don’t disperse, the police officer can arrest you and will be charged with a class B misdemeanor and a $100 fine.

So imagine that you are standing in front of your house on the sidewalk with your friends, two who are a racial minority.  You live in a safe place in West Valley, but the entire city has been designated a “gang area” because the mayor is “tough on crime.”  A West Valley police officer comes up to you and your friends and tells you that you can’t stand on the sidewalk.  When you point to your house, he accuses you of refusing to leave and arrests all of you.  Even though your friends aren’t gang members, the police only has to “reasonably believe” that someone is a gang member.  Because most gang members are racial minorities, the police can target anyone who looks a certain way or has a darker skin color.

Although the First Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees citizens a right to assemble (meaning that they can gather in public without fear of arrest), Utah’s new law goes against that right.  If police make a group of people with no gang affiliation disperse, they have violated that group’s constitutional rights.

If you were arrested and accused of being a gang member, you should contact a qualified attorney that can help you claim your innocence.

US Supreme Court: Arizona v. Gant

Before the recent US Supreme Court ruling in Arizona v. Gant, police could arrest you and then search your car for “officer safety.”  The reasoning, from a previous Supreme Court ruling (New York v. Belton), was that an arrestee standing near the car might reach into the vehicle to grab a weapon and injure the police officer.

Many legal scholars and attorneys thought that this standard failed to meet the standard of probable cause.  That is, after arresting someone, the police officers wouldn’t have probable cause to search the vehicle because the arrestee wouldn’t have access to the vehicle.

Thanks to the new Supreme Court ruling, police officers cannot simply arrest someone and then search the car.  The only way police can search an arrestee’s car is if they reasonably believe that (1) the arrested individual might access the vehicle at the time of the search; or (2) the arrested individual’s vehicle contains evidence of the offense that led to the arrest.

Remember, if you are arrested and police ask to search your car, refuse!  If they do search the car without your consent, do not argue and let them.  This is a legal issue that can be dealt with later by your attorney.

When dealing with the police remember the three golden rules:
1. Don’t trust or believe the police.
2. Don’t resist being handcuffed.
3. Don’t say a damn thing.

Question: Do I have to talk to Salt Lake Police?

Jesse, on the topic of  Constitutional Rights, Dealing with Police
0comment
Photo: Thomas Hawk

Photo: Thomas Hawk

Q:  A Salt Lake City police officer stopped me on the street and asked me if he could ask some questions.  I felt like I had no choice but to say yes.  He asked me a few questions and then let me go.  Could I have said no?

There are three levels of stops in Utah: Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3.  The difference between the three is how much a police officer suspects you of committing a crime.  The more he suspects that you did something illegal, the more legal authority he has in keeping you from walking away.

It sounds like you experienced a Level 1 stop, which means you could have politely declined to answer any questions.  Think of this as a stranger who walks up to you to ask a question: you can always say no.  When the officer asks, be polite and say something like, “I’m sorry, I’m in a hurry.  Have a nice day!”  If the officer didn’t suspect you of anything when he first asked the question, he cannot detain you.

If the cop tries to intimidate you to answer his questions, you should ask, “Are you detaining me right now, or am I free to leave?”  If this really is a Level 1 stop, the officer should let you go on your way.

A Level 2 stop is when a police officer has “reasonable articulable suspicion” that you committed a crime.  This means that the officer reasonably suspects that you are involved in illegal activity.  A Level 3 stop is when the officer has “probable cause” that you committed the crime, meaning that he thinks that you probably did something illegal.  Under both a Level 2 and Level 3 stop, the cops are detaining you.  You are not free to leave.

If an officer tells you that you are not free to leave, the officer should be able to tell you why you are being detained.  If the cop starts asking you questions, the only questions you are obligated to answer are questions about your name, address, and explanation of your actions.  You do not have to answer questions that could incriminate you.  If you are being questioned by a police officer, simply ask for an attorney and the questioning should stop. At your next available opportunity, you should contact an attorney to assist you through the investigation.

When dealing with the police remember the three golden rules:

1. Don’t trust or believe the police.
2. Don’t resist being handcuffed.
3. Don’t say a damn thing.

Self Representation vs. Hiring a Utah Attorney

Jesse, on the topic of  Constitutional Rights, Legal Process
0comment

The Utah Constitution gives every Utah citizen the right to represent themselves in court.  (”A judge shall accord to every person who has a legal interest in a proceeding, or that person’s lawyer, full right to be heard according to law. Judicial Canon III b 8).  It is called pro se representation.  But should you take advantage of that right?

Defendant will represent themselves for various reasons:
•    Defendant doesn’t want a lawyer.
•    Defendant doesn’t want to hire a lawyer.
•    Defendant thinks it will be fun to act like a lawyer.
•    Defendant can hire a lawyer, but the crime is so small that they don’t want to pay for a lawyer
•    Defendant watches television shows with lawyers and thinks being a lawyer is easy.
•    Defendant thinks he knows the rules of the court.
•    Defendant is in jail and wants to write her own appeal to the Supreme Court.

Generally, it is a good idea to hire a lawyer.  After all, it is a lawyer’s job to know how to navigate the court system.  All lawyers go to law school for three years to learn how to be a lawyer, so reading a book on how to represent yourself in court is not a good idea if you’re going up against a prosecutor with years of experience.

However, there are some instances where a person wouldn’t need a lawyer.  If someone is charged with a small crime, like a traffic ticket, it might not make sense to hire a lawyer.  But if a person is charged with a DUI, they definitely need a lawyer.

To decide whether to hire an lawyer or not, the first thing you should do is find out the maximum punishment  for the crime you are charged with.  If the punishment is a $50 fine, you probably don’t need an lawyer.  But if the punishment is $1,000 and up to six months in jail, you need an lawyer to help you.

A lawyers will know the rules of evidence, how to address everyone in the courtroom, and will know the rules of the court.  A judge doesn’t have to explain things to a lawyer as she would with someone representing themselves.  Although you may ultimately choose to represent yourself, judges can sometimes be more tolerant with pro se litigants than with lawyers.  But that tolerance will only go so far–the judge will know that one party knows the law and the other party thinks they know the law.

School Strip Searches: Supreme Court says Illegal

Jesse, on the topic of  Constitutional Rights, News
0comment
Photo: swissrolli

Photo: swissrolli

Fourth Amendment rights when they strip searched her to look for prescription-strength ibuprofen.  The Fourth Amendment protects citizens from unreasonable searches.  In this case, school officials ordered the student to take off her clothes and show them the inside of her underwear.

Although this didn’t happen in Utah, the Supreme Court’s ruling applies to all states.  Therefore, if your child is asked to remove his or her clothing by a school official, your child should refuse and immediately call you.  While school officials can strip search students if it is truly warranted, it is more than likely that a situation involving your child will not reach that level.  It is more likely that a school official is misusing their power.

If this situation occurs, or your child consents to a strip search at school without your permission, you should contact a qualified attorney as soon as possible to discuss your legal options.

Your Right to a Utah Attorney

Jesse, on the topic of  Constitutional Rights, Dealing with Police
Comments Offcomment

right to remain silent

Photo: ko_an

After you are arrested by cops in Salt Lake, the first thing they will do is give you a Miranda Warning:

“You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you. Do you understand the rights I have just read to you?”

Sometimes, a cop will also ask, “With these rights in mind, do you wish to speak to me?” Just say no! Even if you are innocent, say no.  It is better to have an experienced attorney by your side protecting your rights than to do it by yourself.  Although police might intimidate you into talking, they could turn what you say into an admission of guilt.  Don’t let them!  Innocent people try to explain themselves to the police.  This is a mistake because your words could be twisted by police.  Don’t say a damn thing!

You have a 6th Amendment right that guarantees you the right to be represented by an attorney in a criminal case where jail or prison time may be imposed.  If questioned by the police remember to remain silent and ask for an attorney. Remember it is the police’s job to put you in jail, so don’t be afraid to ask for your attorney.