Archive for the ‘Constitutional Rights’ Category

Book Review by Utah Attorney Ralph Dellapiana: Convictions by John Kroger

photo: Felixco, Inc.

photo: Felixco, Inc.

Convictions by John Kroger: A Prosecutor’s Battles Against Mafia Killers, Drug Kingpins, and Enron Thieves

I am going to start this review with a disclaimer. I am biased, particularly against prosecutors. I am a public defender, and through years of trench warfare I have wounds enough to have learned to have a healthy skepticism about the difficulty of getting “justice” in the criminal justice system. And I blame a lot of the problems on prosecutors. More than one prosecutor has told me he or she can’t do the right thing, or doesn’t care if my client is innocent, or if the police are lying to make a bad arrest stick.

But in Convictions: A Prosecutor’s Battles Against Mafia Killers, Drug Kingpins, and Enron Thieves, John Kroger reveals his own misgivings about the morality of the federal prosecutor’s job. He writes of a “darker side” of his job and the “ethical obstacle course” that he had to try to navigate. He saw how the FBI kept Mafia members on the government’s payroll and looked away as they continued to commit crimes; and how the DEA allowed a big drug cartel player to stay in business as long as the DEA was allowed to skim ten-fifteen percent off drug money shipments. Kroger discloses how he “secretly grew disgusted” at the moral ambiguity of the job. He became concerned about the vast power the prosecutor wields in the federal criminal system, noting that one federal judge complained that “Congress has cast the federal prosecutor in the role of God.”

Kroger adds, “we want to be idealistic, but in the end we accomplish our jobs through threats. You threaten to send your target to prison for life unless they cooperate; you threaten to send our witnesses to prison if they don’t tell the truth; you threaten your defendant’s spouse with indictment unless your defendant pleads. Over time the suffering witnesses and the suffering you cause begin to change you.”

Kroger’s frank acknowledgment of the ethical problems in the system gives him instant credibility with me. In fact, in the end, there are enough ethical dilemmas explored in the book to justify giving three hours of CLE credit simply for reading Kroger’s book.

There are enough ethical dilemmas explored to justify giving three hours of CLE credit simply for reading Kroger’s book. (more…)

Innocent Until Proven Guilty: What does this really mean?

Jesse, on the topic of  Constitutional Rights, Legal Process, Utah Law
0comment

Photo: Ann Althouse

Our criminal justice system is based upon the idea that a person is innocent until proven guilty.  Until a jury decides whether they believe you are guilty or innocent, the law treats you as an innocent person.  During your trial, the prosecution has the burden of proof to convince a jury that you are guilty.  The belief behind this system is that if the government is going to take away your liberty, they must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that you in fact committed the crime.  If they cannot prove you are guilty, you are allowed to keep your liberty.  That is the way the system is supposed to work.

Unfortunately, the system isn’t that perfect.  When the news reports that a person allegedly committed a crime, most viewers automatically assume that the person is guilty.  If the newspaper reports on a teacher who is accused of having sex with his students, people assume that the teacher is guilty.

Even though our criminal justice system is based on “innocent until proven guilty,” the general public always rushes to judgment.  During jury selection, the judge or lawyers will usually ask, “Does anyone believe that because a person is arrested and charged with a crime, they probably committed that crime?”  Potential jurors often raise their hands.  As a defendant, you wouldn’t want that kind of person on the jury deciding your future.

Because the general public has a difficult time with the concept of “innocent until proven guilty,” it is critical that you hire an attorney who can explain this concept to juries.  If your attorney can prove that the prosecution cannot prove guilt, then you will be found innocent.

Falsely Accused of being a Utah Gang Member?

Jesse, on the topic of  Constitutional Rights, Dealing with Police, Utah Law
0comment

Photo: vabellon

Wearing certain clothing, being in a certain place, or being of a certain racial minority could possibly identify you as a gang member to police.  Seems unfair?  It is.  And during the 2009 Utah Legislative session, lawmakers made it easier for police to arrest innocent racial minorities for standing in the wrong place for too long and accuse them of being a member of a gang.

Senate Bill 16 (which was passed and is now law), sponsored by Senator Jon Griener (who is the Odgen City Police Chief), allows police officers to confront a group of people and tell them to disperse.  The only requirements are that the police officer must “reasonably believe” that the group includes at least one gang member and the area where people are in is a “gang area.”  There is no limitation on how big the “area” can be, so a “gang area” could be the entire city of West Valley.

If you don’t disperse, the police officer can arrest you and will be charged with a class B misdemeanor and a $100 fine.

So imagine that you are standing in front of your house on the sidewalk with your friends, two who are a racial minority.  You live in a safe place in West Valley, but the entire city has been designated a “gang area” because the mayor is “tough on crime.”  A West Valley police officer comes up to you and your friends and tells you that you can’t stand on the sidewalk.  When you point to your house, he accuses you of refusing to leave and arrests all of you.  Even though your friends aren’t gang members, the police only has to “reasonably believe” that someone is a gang member.  Because most gang members are racial minorities, the police can target anyone who looks a certain way or has a darker skin color.

Although the First Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees citizens a right to assemble (meaning that they can gather in public without fear of arrest), Utah’s new law goes against that right.  If police make a group of people with no gang affiliation disperse, they have violated that group’s constitutional rights.

If you were arrested and accused of being a gang member, you should contact a skilled Utah criminal defense lawyer who can help you claim your innocence.

U.S. Supreme Court: Arizona v. Gant

Before the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Arizona v. Gant, police could arrest you and then search your car for “officer safety.”  The reasoning, from a previous Supreme Court ruling (New York v. Belton), was that an arrestee standing near the car might reach into the vehicle to grab a weapon and injure the police officer.

Many legal scholars and attorneys thought that this standard failed to meet the standard of probable cause.  That is, after arresting someone, the police officers wouldn’t have probable cause to search the vehicle because the arrestee wouldn’t have access to the vehicle.

Thanks to the new Supreme Court ruling, police officers in Utah  cannot simply arrest someone and then search the car.  The only way police in Utah can search an arrestee’s car is if they reasonably believe that (1) the arrested individual might access the vehicle at the time of the search; or (2) the arrested individual’s vehicle contains evidence of the offense that led to the arrest.

Remember, if you are arrested and police ask to search your car, refuse!  If they do search the car without your consent, do not argue and let them.  This is a legal issue that can be dealt with later by an adept and seasoned Utah criminal defense lawyer.

When dealing with the police remember the three golden rules:
1. Don’t trust or believe the police.
2. Don’t resist being handcuffed.
3. Don’t say a damn thing.

Question: Do I have to talk to Salt Lake Police?

Jesse, on the topic of  Constitutional Rights, Dealing with Police
0comment
Photo: Thomas Hawk

Photo: Thomas Hawk

 

Q:  A Salt Lake City police officer stopped me on the street and asked me if he could ask some questions.  I felt like I had no choice but to say yes.  He asked me a few questions and then let me go.  Could I have said no?

There are three levels of stops in Utah: Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3.  The difference between the three is how much a police officer suspects you of committing a crime.  The more he suspects that you did something illegal, the more legal authority he has in keeping you from walking away.

It sounds like you experienced a Level 1 stop, which means you could have politely declined to answer any questions.  Think of this as a stranger who walks up to you to ask a question: you can always say no.  When the officer asks, be polite and say something like, “I’m sorry, I’m in a hurry.  Have a nice day!”  If the officer didn’t suspect you of anything when he first asked the question, he cannot detain you.

If the cop tries to intimidate you to answer his questions, you should ask, “Are you detaining me right now, or am I free to leave?”  If this really is a Level 1 stop, the officer should let you go on your way.

A Level 2 stop is when a police officer has “reasonable articulable suspicion” that you committed a crime.  This means that the officer reasonably suspects that you are involved in illegal activity.  A Level 3 stop is when the officer has “probable cause” that you committed the crime, meaning that he thinks that you probably did something illegal.  Under both a Level 2 and Level 3 stop, the cops are detaining you.  You are not free to leave.

If an officer tells you that you are not free to leave, the officer should be able to tell you why you are being detained.  If the cop starts asking you questions, the only questions you are obligated to answer are questions about your name, address, and explanation of your actions.  You do not have to answer questions that could incriminate you.  If you are being questioned by a police officer, simply ask for an attorney and the questioning should stop. At your next available opportunity, you should contact an experienced Utah criminal defense attorney to assist you through the investigation.

When dealing with the police remember the three golden rules:

1. Don’t trust or believe the police.
2. Don’t resist being handcuffed.
3. Don’t say a damn thing.