Estranged Ex-Husband Facing Six Counts of Vehicle Arson in Utah

An estranged ex-husband, who allegedly lit his former wife’s car on fire along with multiple others throughout Iron County Utah, is facing a total of six counts of vehicle arson.

Not the right way to get her attention

Photo by: Billie Grace Ward

Photo by: Billie Grace Ward

23 year old Issac Wall of Beaver Utah was arrested for multiple counts of vehicle arson after witnesses described a man fitting his description fleeing the scene of the first vehicle was torched. The person living at that Cedar City home just so happened to be Wall’s ex-wife.

Covering his tracks

In what some are describing as a failed attempt to cover his tracks, Wall left his ex-wife’s car on flames and then went to three random locations throughout the area and ignited an additional five vehicles on fire. Four of the vehicles ended up being a complete loss while the other two had minor damage.

Vehicle arson

Vehicle Arson

Photo by: perthhdproductions

Utah Code 76-6-102 states “A person is guilty of arson if, under circumstances not amounting to aggravated arson [where a home or habited vehicle or building is involved], the person by means of fire or explosives unlawfully and intentionally damages:

a) Any property with intention of defrauding an insurer; or
b) The property of another.”

Six second degree felonies

The charges for arson depend on the value of the property damaged and whether or not anyone was, or could have been hurt. Fortunately, no one was injured in the any of the instances of vehicle arson that Wall was supposedly responsible for. Yet due to the extensive damage and value of the automobiles involved in the vehicle arson, Wall is facing six second degree felonies; each with a possible prison sentence of one to 15 years and a fine of up to $10,000.

Divorce counseling

Photo by: Joe Houghton

Photo by: Joe Houghton

While numerous married couples will attempt counseling at a way of reconciling their relationship, rarely is counseling ever suggested for divorced couples unless children are involved. Divorce therapists and counseling centers are available however, and are often free through religious affiliations or covered by many health insurance companies. For those struggling with the aftermath of a divorce, it is recommended to speak to someone to sort out any lingering issues. For those who have made poor choices following a divorce, such as Issac Wall and his six counts of vehicle arson, it is imperative to seek a criminal defense attorney immediately.

Communications Fraud and Theft from a Utah School District

A southern Utah man was placed being bars Friday for communications fraud as well as theft after he installed audio and video equipment for a school district that was inferior to what they had purchased.

Not what they ordered

Communications Fraud

Photo by: MiNe

An investigation into Dustin Taylor, a former manager of a St. George company that sells audio and video systems began last year after the Washington County School District as well as a local theater company discovered that although they had ordered high quality equipment for their facilities, what ended up being installed was far lower value. Police discovered Taylor had been running his own business on the side and had allegedly taken the better equipment before installing it for a job contract through his side business. Taylor was arrested for communications fraud as well as multiple charges of theft.

Communications fraud

Utah Code 76-10-1801 states “Any person who has devised any scheme or artifice to defraud another or to obtain from another money, property, or anything of value by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, promises, or material omissions, and who communicates directly or indirectly with any person by any means for the purpose of executing or concealing the scheme or artifice is guilty of:

a) A class B misdemeanor when the value of the property ( . . . ) is less than $500;

b) A class A misdemeanor when the value ( . . . ) is [between $500 and $1,500];

c) A third degree felony when the value ( . . . ) is [between $1,500 and $5,000];

d) A second degree felony when the value of the property ( . . . ) exceeds $5,000.

The monetary loss of the customers who were defrauded by Taylor was estimated to be around $34,000.

Theft by deception

Not only did Taylor deceive customers by installing inferior equipment, but he took the high quality equipment from the company he was working for to install elsewhere without their knowledge. As Utah Code 76-6-405 states, he “obtain[ed] or exercise[d] control over property of another person: by deception; and with a purpose to deprive the other person of property.” The charges for theft by deception depend on the value of the item stolen and are identical to the charges by value for communications fraud. In Taylor’s case, the value of the audio and video equipment that Taylor had appropriated and resold or had in his possession was estimated to be as high as $89,000. This resulted in multiple theft charges; each being another second degree felony. Each second degree felony charge for communications fraud and theft is punishable by up to 15 years in prison and a fine of $10,000.

Reduced sentencing for first-time offender

Photo by: Mark Strozier

Photo by: Mark Strozier

It is unknown whether Taylor intentionally concocted a plan to deceive the school district and other companies or if an opportunity to make more money fell into his lap and he thought no one would be the wiser. Either way, what he did was against the law and he risked spending nearly a lifetime in jail, especially if his sentences were to be run consecutively. Fortunately, Taylor had a clean record and was an outstanding citizen prior to his theft and communications fraud charges. This was likely his saving grace.

What a deal

As part of a plea deal that reduced his charges to third degree felonies, Taylor was sentenced for up to five years in prison and a fine of $5,000 for communications fraud and five years each for multiple theft charges as well. The judge also ordered these to be run consecutively. Following this sentencing, the judge changed the sentencing to a single term of a five months and then even further reduced the prison term to 60 days for the 39 year old father of four. After his two months in jail which began Friday, Taylor is ordered to be on probation for three years and offer 100 hours of community service. He was also ordered to write letters of apology to the customers he victimized. For multiple second degree felonies to end in a single two month prison sentence is incredible. The probable explanation for the judge’s mercy, beyond the obvious help of an experienced defense attorney, is likely due to Taylor’s lack of a criminal record prior to the communication fraud and theft charges. For anyone facing charges that seem too immense to handle, don’t lose hope until discussing what a criminal defense attorney can do for you.

Multiple Felony Charges of Domestic Violence in the Presence of a Child

A Payson Utah man is facing multiple felony charges of domestic violence in the presence of a child following an assault on a woman in front on her children.

911 hang-up call

Photo by: Philippe Put

Photo by: Philippe Put

Police were dispatched to a Payson Utah home after a 911 hang-up call. The emergency dispatcher who received the call stated that although it was brief, they could hear a distraught woman screaming and shouting in the background. When police arrived, one of the children opened the door and officers found their mother bruised and bleeding from a large laceration to her head.

Wrong use of a kitchen utensil

36 year old Aaron Garcia, a former mixed martial arts (MMA) fighter was arrested for charges including aggravated assault after the woman stated Garcia hit her on the head with a wooden rolling pin. Garcia had been drinking heavily prior to the assault and was unable to recall details of what prevailed that evening besides that he was getting cross with the woman throughout the day. After searching the home, a wooden rolling pin was located, bloody and broken. Garcia is facing five third degree felonies following the assault at the Payson home, each with a maximum penalty of 5 years in prison and $5,000 fine.

Domestic violence

Photo by: Nari Sin

Photo by: Nari Sin

One of the charges against Garcia is for the aggravated assault on the woman which is also considered domestic violence, although an additional charge for that specifically was not issued. Domestic violence is thought to take place between spouses; however it can be any violent behavior between multiple occupants of the same living environment. It was not reported what relationship Garcia had to the woman he assaulted. All that is known at this time is that Garcia and the woman were both residents of the same address. There is a possibility that Garcia was the woman’s spouse, yet he could have also been a live in boyfriend or just a roommate.

Domestic violence in the presence of a child

Although Garcia wasn’t charged with domestic violence for his assault on his cohabitant, his other four third degree felonies came from charges of domestic violence in the presence of a child because there were children present during the attack. Utah Code 76-5-109.1 states “A person commits domestic violence in the presence of a child if the person: ( . . . ) intentionally causes serious bodily injury to a cohabitant or uses a dangerous weapon [like a rolling pin] or other means or force likely to produce death or serious bodily injury against a cohabitant in the presence of a child.”

One charge per child present

Domestic violence in the presence of a child

Photo by: Natesh Ramasamy

Although there was only one assault in question, Garcia is facing four charges of domestic violence in the presence of a child likely due the fact that there were four children home when the violence took place. Utah Code 76-5-109.1(5) explains when a person violates the above section “when more than one child is present [they are] guilty of one offense of domestic violence in the presence of a child regarding each child present when the violation occurred.”

Consecutive vs concurrent

When someone is charged with a crime, they may not seek legal counsel if they assume the prosecution has a rock solid case. However, there are other important reasons to be represented by an attorney. When someone is facing multiple offenses, if they are found guilty the judge can decide whether the sentences are to be run consecutively or concurrently. Consecutive sentences are served one after another; in Garcia’s case that would equal up to 25 years in prison. Concurrent sentences are all served at the same time; for Garcia, that would mean no more than five years for all charges combined. If anyone is facing charges for multiple offenses, speak with an attorney to find out options for defending the charges or at least reducing the prison terms.