Archive for the ‘Legal Process’ Category

The Consequences of Violating a Protective Order in Utah

Utah Attorney, Brooke Winters, on the topic of  Crimes, Criminal Defense Misc, Hiring a Lawyer, Legal Process
0comment

If you have been charged with domestic assault and there is a protective order in place do not contact the protected person. The protected party can not modify, waive, alter or dismiss the order. Only the court has the authority to lift the protective order. So if protected person contacts you and asks you to come to where they are, don’t do it because that is a violation.

If the crime you have been charged with is a felony then a violation of the protective order is a Third Degree felony. If, however you are charged with a class B Domestic Assault then a violation becomes a Class A.

Contact a Utah criminal attorney with any questions you may have about your domestic assault case.

Exceptions to the Search Warrant Requirement in Utah

Utah Attorney, Brooke Winters, on the topic of  Constitutional Rights, Criminal Defense Misc, Dealing with Police, Legal Process
0comment

The Fourth Amendment guarantees that the people be free from unreasonable search and seizure and before the government can search our Utah homes, Utah businesses or person a valid search warrant is required. However, there are exceptions to the warrant requirement.

1. The police can search without a warrant if exigent circumstances exist. Exigent circumstances can be somewhat of a catchall but include emergency situations but the police must be able to articulate the emergency and not be the one who created the emergency situation.
2. They may search your person or your immediate area incident to a lawful arrest. This is for officer safety and to avoid the possible destruction of evidence.
3. Consent. Obviously if you give police the ok to search your house or vehicle then they can do so without a warrant but the search must still be based on probable cause.
4. The police are allowed to search your vehicle without a warrant due to the transient nature of vehicles allowing the evidence to simply drive away.
5. Plain view. If the police are legitimately present then they can seize anything illegal they see.
6. Inventory search. If you are booked into jail and your vehicle is impounded or your personal possessions taken from you then those items in your vehicle or possession will be inventoried.
7. Stop and frisk. A Terry stop is a brief detention to investigate suspicious conduct; the frisk is a brief pat down of the outer clothing to check for weapons which is justified by officer safety.
8. If officers are in hot pursuit of an individual they can follow individual into their home without a warrant and seize any evidence in plain view.

Incompetent to Stand Trial in Utah?

Utah Attorney, Brooke Winters, on the topic of  Criminal Defense Misc, Legal Process, Utah Court, Utah Crime News, Utah Law
0comment

In Utah, a defendant must be able to understand the nature of the charges against them, their rights and be able to participate in their own defense and if they are unable to do so because of mental illness or other mental deficiencies a defendant may be found incompetent to stand trial. Between 2% and 8% of all felony defendants in the United States are referred for competency evaluations. Here in Utah, if a defendant is found incompetent to stand trial they are committed to the executive director of the Department of Human Services to see if they can be restored to competency through treatment and/or medication. If however, competency isn’t restored and there is a substantial probability that the defendant will not become competent in the foreseeable future the court must release the defendant from the custody of the director unless the court is informed of civil commitment proceedings.
Such is the case for a Utah man who in 2007 was charged with rape, sodomy and aggravated sexual abuse of a child. Lonnie Johnson was declared incompetent to stand trial after numerous competency evaluations and has been held at the Utah State Hospital since 2008. In April 2011 Mr. Johnson was released by a 4th District Court Judge who had no legal basis for continuing to hold him based on a doctor’s report that it was unlikely that he would ever regain competency. Prosecutor’s are now working to have Johnson civilly committed. If however prosecutors are unable to show that Johnson’s mental illness makes him a danger to himself or others it is possible he will be set free.

The Insanity Defense

Utah Criminal Defense Blog, on the topic of  Legal Process, Question
0comment

Is insanity a defense in Utah? Can someone be so insane that they can commit a crime yet be found not guilty?

Technically, there is an insanity defense on the books. Back in the 1980s, John Hinckley was found not guilty by reason of insanity after trying to assassinate President Reagan. The Utah legislature reacted to public outrage over the Hinckley verdict by crafting one of the country’s strictest laws.

Utah’s law allows a person to plead “not guilty by reason of insanity.” But, for all practical purposes the defense is very narrow. In most states, a person who did not understand the wrongfulness of their actions or who was acting under an irresistible impulse cannot be convicted of a crime.

In Utah, the insanity defense is more restricted. The defense only applies to people who have such severe mental illness that their disease prevents them from possessing the mental state required as an element of the crime. For example, a person who murdered his girl friend because he thought she was a robot working for the Mafia could be found not guilty by reason of insanity. Why? Because he lacked the intent to kill a human being.

But, a defendant who knowingly kills another person because of a psychotic episode would not be entitled to the insanity defense if the defendant could act knowingly or intentionally, even if he couldn’t appreciate the wrongfulness of his actions or acted under an irresistible impulse. Under Utah law, it wouldn’t matter if the defendant had a mental illness.

Still, the law allows a jury to take a defendant’s mental illness into account. For example, a jury may reach a verdict of “guilty and mentally ill.” Under that verdict, a defendant would first be sent to the State Hospital for a mental health evaluation and treatment. After spending up to 18 months at the hospital or until the defendant gets the maximum benefit from treatment, whichever comes first, the defendant would then be sent to prison for the balance of his sentence.

Issues of crime and mental illness are complicated. Some mental illness may even affect a defendant’s competence to stand trial. If the mental illness is severe enough, the case may even be dismissed without trial.

If you or a loved one struggling with mental illness find yourselves tangled in the criminal justice system, it’s important to seek competent legal counsel as soon as possible. Defendants with mental health issues have special needs that must be addressed quickly and aggressively.

Post Conviction Appeal Decision in Utah

Utah Criminal Defense Blog, on the topic of  Legal Process
0comment

A post conviction appeal concerning retail theft has received a response, noted by a memorandum decision which was recently filed by the Utah Court of Appeals. Every person who has been convicted of a crime is allowed at least one post conviction appeal.

The Background

Photo: Brian Turner

Lucia Arnold and Vanessa Arnold were arrested for shoplifting clothing at a Provo department store. According to Vanessa Arnold, following her arrest a Utah County deputy sheriff threatened her with a gun, demanding that she drop a pending civil lawsuit against him. Both women were found guilty of retail theft and convicted of a third-degree felony. The Arnolds filed their appeal based on a single assertion of ineffective assistance of counsel regarding a court exclusion of evidence concerning the alleged threat by the deputy sheriff.

The Post Conviction Appeal

The Arnolds’ post conviction appeal states that counsel should have argued more effectively to seek release from the court’s exclusion order. However, apparently the Arnolds’ counsel knew that the deputy sheriff was out of the country at the time of trial and that the Arnolds’ testimony would have been the only evidence about the alleged threat. According to the appellate court, defense counsel made a tactical decision that the Arnolds’ testimony regarding the threat could have done more harm than good and opted not to pursue reversing the exclusion order.

The Decision

The Court of Appeals determined that the Arnolds did not establish professionally deficient performance by trial counsel or prejudice arising from counsel’s decisions. They denied the post conviction appeal of ineffective assistance of counsel and affirmed the Arnolds’ convictions.

What If I Violate My Utah Criminal Probation?

Utah Criminal Defense Blog, on the topic of  Legal Process, Utah Court
0comment

Utah probation is a privilege extended to a defendant who has been convicted of a crime and is almost always conditional. If you violate the terms and conditions of probation, then a judge can impose the original sentence, which in most cases includes jail or prison time. If your probation officer or the Court believe that you have violated probation, then an Order to Show Cause hearing, usually referred to as an OSC, is scheduled. At that hearing it is the prosecutor’s responsibility to provide evidence that the defendant is in violation of their probation by a preponderance of the evidence. Generally however, a defendant will need to present evidence of compliance. For example, a defendant may have completed community service, but proof of that community service did not reach the court, then a defendant may provide proof of community service. You have the right to hire a utah criminal defense attorney for an order to show cause.

Utah Treatment & Counseling Options

Angela, on the topic of  Crimes, Legal Process
0comment

In Utah there are many counseling and treatment programs that deal with problems other than alcohol and drug problems. These treatment includes the following:

 Theft Workshop Classes

A theft workshop class is a one day class and is generally required for people convicted of shoplifting or another theft related offense.

 Domestic Violence Counseling

Domestic Violence counseling is usually a 4-6 month program and include a group session component as well as individual one on one treatment. These classes are ordered for convictions which are designated as a domestic violence offense.

 Anger Management Classes

Anger management classes are similar to domestic violence classes but they focus on how to better control anger.

 Life Skills Classes

Life Skills is a course that helps people cope with thier everyday problems like balancing a checkbook and going to work. This class is helpful for people who have been on drugs for a while and need to re-learn how to integrate back into society.

 Sex Offender Classes

Sex offender classes are often court ordered and may include group and one-on-one counseling. These classes may last many months and even years.

 Driving school Classes

Driving school classes are a one day course to help prevent a ticket from going onto your driving record. These classes are provided in Englsih and Spanish.

The United States and Utah Places Too Many of it’s Citizens in Prison for Non-Violent/Drug Related Offenses

Clayton Simms, Criminal Defense Attorney, on the topic of  Drugs in Utah, Legal Process, Utah Crime Related Videos
0comment

Utah has experienced a growth in it’s prison population over the last two decades because like the rest of the United States, we lock up drug offenders rather than provide them with treatment.

Unreasonable Search and Seizure in Utah

Utah Criminal Defense Blog, on the topic of  Constitutional Rights, Legal Process
0comment

Many people have been stopped by a police officer, just as Gary Duhaime was pulled over by a police officer along Interstate 80 in Utah a couple of years ago. However, not every person subjected to questioning by police is also detained while a drug-sniffing dog is called to the scene. There are times when law enforcement is justified in detaining a motorist and times when they are not.

Photo: Jake Spurlock

Duhaime was traveling eastbound on Interstate 80 when a police officer noticed that the car Duhaime was driving had a burned out license plate light. That is against the law in Utah, so the officer pulled Duhaime over. The officer asked for the usual identification materials from Duhaime and questioned him about his travel plans. During the stop, the officer found the presence of several items in the car suspicious, such as a map, a GPS device, fast food containers, luggage in the backseat and four cell phones. He asked Duhaime if there were drugs in the car and for permission to search the vehicle. Duhaime told him there were not any drugs in the car and declined to allow the officer to search the car. The officer made a call to headquarters requesting a drug-sniffing dog. Another officer arrived with the dog, who alerted police to the trunk of the car where seventy-six one-pound vacuum sealed bags of marijuana were found. Duhaime was arrested and taken to jail. 

Duhaime presented a motion at trial court to suppress the finding of marijuana, based on his assertion that the police officer did not have reasonable suspicion to stop Duhaime for an equipment or traffic violation and that the officer detained Duhaime for an unreasonable amount of time. The trial court did not agree with the motion and found Duhaime guilty.

Duhaime then filed a motion with the Utah Court of Appeals. The Court found that the police officer was justified in making the traffic stop, but that the evidence noticed by the officer was not sufficient to show a reasonable suspicion that Duhaime was transporting illegal drugs. On June 30, the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s denial of Duhaime’s motion to suppress and remanded the case.

The 4th amendment prohibits unreasonable search and seizure. Regardless of whether or not you agree with people transporting drugs, it is important to note that people deserve to have their 4th amendment rights upheld.

Alleged Murder/Suicide in Utah

Utah Criminal Defense Blog, on the topic of  Legal Process, Utah Crime News
0comment

A man allegedly killed his wife and then turned the gun on himself Tuesday in a South Jordan park. Apparently, the woman had filed for divorce that same day. The wife was pronounced dead at the scene, but the man, as of Wednesday, is still in critical condition. Police were dispatched to the couple’s home in January of this year for a domestic violence situation. The man had two previous divorces, both of which involved claims of cohabitant abuse and protective orders. 

There are various situations for which a person can be charged with murder in Utah. Sometimes, murder in Utah is charged as a first degree felony. The Utah code states that criminal homicide constitutes murder if a person intentionally or knowingly causes the death of another. Again, there are many variables when a murder is charged. There is the charge when a person is arrested, but that may not be the same charge for which a person is prosecuted. First degree felonies in Utah can carry a five years to life penalty, but that can be different depending on the charges and what crime the person is ultimately found guilty of committing.

This alleged murder is an unusual circumstance. If the man survives his alleged suicide attempt, he may be charged with a felony; that depends on law enforcement and any other facts that may not be known at this time. 

Keep in mind that criminal charges of any nature should never be taken lightly. Additionally, criminal convictions can have a variety of negative consequences that may follow a person for life. If you, or someone you care about, need legal advice, contact a Utah criminal defense attorney right away. You need to know what your rights are and how to best protect yourself in the justice system. Don’t wait to get the assistance you are entitled to.