Posts Tagged ‘guilty’

U.S. Supreme Court Rules that Non-citizens have a Sixth Amendment Right to Effective Criminal Defense Counsel

Jessica, on the topic of  Constitutional Rights, Legal Process
0comment

The United States Supreme Court overturned a ruling of the Kentucky Supreme Court, stating, “Because counsel must inform a client whether his plea carries a risk of deportation, Padilla has sufficiently alleged that his counsel was constitutionally deficient. Whether he is entitled to relief depends on whether he has been prejudiced, a matter not addressed here.” (Padilla v. Kentucky, 2010). Josè Padilla is a longtime legal resident of Kentucky and a Vietnam Veteran who never applied for U.S. citizenship. He pled guilty to drug-distribution charges and faced deportation. His attorney failed to inform him that his plea could easily be paired with automatic deportation, and eventually falsely claimed this his extensive residency in the U.S. would prohibit this from happening.  Padilla allegedly would not have entered a guilty plea and proceeded to trial if he was aware of the strong possibility of deportation. His case was brought before the Supreme Court of Kentucky alleging a Sixth Amendment infringement for the failure to have effective counsel; he was shot down. Fortunately the United States Supreme Court saw the importance of the matter and heard the case, overturning the Kentucky ruling. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that deportation of a person living lawfully in the US is definitely a serious enough matter that when connected to a criminal plea it must be explained and understood by the defendant. Padilla’s lawyer was incorrect in his advice as the consequences of Padilla’s please could be read in the removal statute. If you are not a legal resident of Utah, or are lacking citizenship you should obtain the best lawyer possible when being charged in a criminal court so you will not receive poor legal advice and be taken advantage of as Josè Padilla was.

 

Innocent Until Proven Guilty: What does this really mean?

Jesse, on the topic of  Constitutional Rights, Legal Process, Utah Law
0comment

Photo: Ann Althouse

Our criminal justice system is based upon the idea that a person is innocent until proven guilty.  Until a jury decides whether they believe you are guilty or innocent, the law treats you as an innocent person.  During your trial, the prosecution has the burden of proof to convince a jury that you are guilty.  The belief behind this system is that if the government is going to take away your liberty, they must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that you in fact committed the crime.  If they cannot prove you are guilty, you are allowed to keep your liberty.  That is the way the system is supposed to work.

Unfortunately, the system isn’t that perfect.  When the news reports that a person allegedly committed a crime, most viewers automatically assume that the person is guilty.  If the newspaper reports on a teacher who is accused of having sex with his students, people assume that the teacher is guilty.

Even though our criminal justice system is based on “innocent until proven guilty,” the general public always rushes to judgment.  During jury selection, the judge or lawyers will usually ask, “Does anyone believe that because a person is arrested and charged with a crime, they probably committed that crime?”  Potential jurors often raise their hands.  As a defendant, you wouldn’t want that kind of person on the jury deciding your future.

Because the general public has a difficult time with the concept of “innocent until proven guilty,” it is critical that you hire an attorney who can explain this concept to juries.  If your attorney can prove that the prosecution cannot prove guilt, then you will be found innocent.

Defenses to Utah Crimes

Jesse, on the topic of  Legal Process, Utah Law
0comment

When you are charged with a crime, you have to plead guilty, not-guilty, or no-contest in some circumstances.  If you plead not-guilty, you have to present a defense to the charges.  Here are some typical defenses that are used:

I Didn’t Do It

Prove that I did it: The prosecution has the burden of proving that you actually committed the crime because you are presumed innocent until proven guilty.  This mean that the prosecution has to convince a judge or jury that you were in the right place, at the right time, and you committed the crime.  You, as the defendant, are not obligated to present a case, call witnesses, or even argue that the prosecutor is wrong.  If the judge or jury doesn’t believe the prosecution’s story, then you will be found not-guilty.

I Wasn’t There

If you were charged with robbery of a bank at 3pm, your alibi defense would be that you were working across town from 1pm-5pm and couldn’t have robbed the bank.  For an alibi defense to work, you will have to convince the jury with evidence that your alibi is truthful.

I Did It, But It Was Self Defense!

Charges of battery (hitting someone), assault, and murder will often result in a self-defense claim.  The defendant will argue that their actions were justified because of the other person’s (the victim) threatening actions.  The questions that will be important here are (1) who was the aggressor, (2) was the threat that the defendant perceived a reasonable threat, and (3) did the defendant use only the reasonable force necessary to protect himself?  If a reasonable person in similar circumstances would have been justified in using the same force that the defendant used, then the defendant has the right to protect himself.  But the defendant can only use force that is reasonable to combat the threat (fist vs. fist okay, but shooting someone with a gun who only threatens you with a fist is not okay).

I Did It, But I Was Insane!

This defense rarely works, and when it does, the defendant doesn’t simply go free.  To prove insanity, the defendant must prove insanity, which can only be accomplished by involving psychiatrists.  The defendant must go through complex testing of their mental state.  If the defendant is found not guilty by reason of insanity, the defendant will be moved to a psychiatric hospital where they will be treated.  Sometimes, the time spent in this hospital will be longer than the prison sentence they would have gotten with a guilty plea.

In Utah, the insanity defense will not work because the state abolished it.  However, a defendant can be found guilty but mentally ill.

Whatever defense you want to present, having the assistance of a skilled Utah Criminal defense attorney will help you to decide what kind of defense is best for you.

Jury Verdicts in Utah

Jesse, on the topic of  Legal Process, Utah Law
0comment

After a trial, there are only four verdicts available.  All verdicts in a criminal case must be unanimous.

Guilty: If a jury finds the defendant guilty, the defendant’s next step is a sentencing hearing.  The defendant has the right to be sentenced within 30 days, or if he chooses, the same day of conviction.

Not-guilty: If a jury finds the defendant not-guilty, the defendant is free to leave and the case is over.  The defendant cannot be charged again for the same crime on the same facts (double jeopardy).

Not-guilty by reason of insanity:  If a jury finds the defendant not-guilty by reason of insanity, the defendant may be moved to a psychiatric hospital where they will be treated.  Sometimes, the time spent in this hospital will be longer than the prison sentence they would have gotten with a guilty plea.

Guilty and mentally ill:  If a jury finds the defendant guilty and mentally ill, the defendant will go to prison, a psychiatric hospital, or a combination of both.