Posts Tagged ‘police’

Oakland, CA Police No Longer Responding to Minor Crimes. Could This Happen in Utah?

Jessica, on the topic of  Crimes, Utah Crime News
0comment
photo: basictheory

photo: basictheory

Oakland California, like the rest of California, is experiencing a serious budget shortfall. The police force in Oakland will be realizing serious layoffs after midnight tonight. Police Cheif Anthony Batts listed 44 situations that his police force will no longer have the ability to respond to after the 80 officers are let-go tonight. Below is a list of some of these crimes.

  • identity theft
  • grand theft
  • burglary
  • pass fictitious check
  • embezzlement by an employee (over $ 400)
  • extortion
  • vandalism

If you live in Oakland and one of these 44 crimes happens to you, you must go online and notify the police. After which, probably nothing will be done. (Preuitt, Sanchez, NBC Bay Area).  The economy in Salt Lake City, Park City and Provo while not ideal is not as bad off as Oakland, California and the probability that any Utah City would allow the police to not respond to minor crimes is very low.  The political outcry in Utah would be deafening if the police refused to respond to minor crimes.

Utah Police Officers may be trained to Lie

Jessica, on the topic of  Dealing with Police
0comment
photo: Vincent J. Brown

photo: Vincent J. Brown

Jim Donahue is an experienced police office with an extensive resume which includes work as U.S. Customs & Immigration Officer, and status as Ambassador for the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund in Washington D.C. He recently wrote an article concerning a major ethical dilemma that the police face everyday: lying.

“Cops learn very early that lying is an essential part of survival, self-preservation and self defense. However, some cops don’t know where to stop. Although lying is not officially accepted behavior, in reality it is tacitly approved by our leaders and seasoned officers. There is enormous peer pressure to conform. Ours is a battle-hardened band of brothers. Nearly every cop is a superb example of humanity, but some cops cannot seem to find the line. They end up on a slippery slope, with their lives and careers sliding into a cesspool of ethical failure. Worse, they call on their brothers to conceal and protect them from scrutiny or incrimination.” (Donahue, Office.com, 7/6/2010)

U.S. Supreme Court: Arizona v. Gant

Jesse Nix, Utah Criminal Defense Lawyer, on the topic of  Constitutional Rights, Dealing with Police, Utah Crime News, Utah Law
0comment

Before the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Arizona v. Gant, police could arrest you and then search your car for “officer safety.”  The reasoning, from a previous Supreme Court ruling (New York v. Belton), was that an arrestee standing near the car might reach into the vehicle to grab a weapon and injure the police officer.

Many legal scholars and attorneys thought that this standard failed to meet the standard of probable cause.  That is, after arresting someone, the police officers wouldn’t have probable cause to search the vehicle because the arrestee wouldn’t have access to the vehicle.

Thanks to the new Supreme Court ruling, police officers in Utah  cannot simply arrest someone and then search the car.  The only way police in Utah can search an arrestee’s car is if they reasonably believe that (1) the arrested individual might access the vehicle at the time of the search; or (2) the arrested individual’s vehicle contains evidence of the offense that led to the arrest.

Remember, if you are arrested and police ask to search your car, refuse!  If they do search the car without your consent, do not argue and let them.  This is a legal issue that can be dealt with later by an adept and seasoned Utah criminal defense lawyer.

When dealing with the police remember the three golden rules:
1. Don’t trust or believe the police.
2. Don’t resist being handcuffed.
3. Don’t say a damn thing.

Utah Criminal Law Question: Do I have to talk to Salt Lake City Police?

Clayton Simms, Criminal Defense Attorney, on the topic of  Constitutional Rights, Dealing with Police
0comment

 

Q:  A Salt Lake City police officer stopped me on the street and asked me if he could ask some questions.  I felt like I had no choice but to say yes.  He asked me a few questions and then let me go.  Could I have said no?

There are three levels of stops in Utah: Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3.  The difference between the three is how much a police officer suspects you of committing a crime.  The more he suspects that you did something illegal, the more legal authority he has in keeping you from walking away.

It sounds like you experienced a Level 1 stop, which means you could have politely declined to answer any questions.  Think of this as a stranger who walks up to you to ask a question: you can always say no.  When the officer asks, be polite and say something like, “I’m sorry, I’m in a hurry.  Have a nice day!”  If the officer didn’t suspect you of anything when he first asked the question, he cannot detain you.

If the cop tries to intimidate you to answer his questions, you should ask, “Are you detaining me right now, or am I free to leave?”  If this really is a Level 1 stop, the officer should let you go on your way.

A Level 2 stop is when a police officer has “reasonable articulable suspicion” that you committed a crime.  This means that the officer reasonably suspects that you are involved in illegal activity.  A Level 3 stop is when the officer has “probable cause” that you committed the crime, meaning that he thinks that you probably did something illegal.  Under both a Level 2 and Level 3 stop, the cops are detaining you.  You are not free to leave.

If an officer tells you that you are not free to leave, the officer should be able to tell you why you are being detained.  If the cop starts asking you questions, the only questions you are obligated to answer are questions about your name, address, and explanation of your actions.  You do not have to answer questions that could incriminate you.  If you are being questioned by a police officer, simply ask for an attorney and the questioning should stop. At your next available opportunity, you should contact the best Utah criminal defense attorney to assist you through the investigation.

When dealing with the police remember the three golden rules:

1. Don’t trust or believe the police.
2. Don’t resist being handcuffed.
3. Don’t say a damn thing.

Tasers in Utah: Too Quick on the Draw

Jesse Nix, Utah Criminal Defense Lawyer, on the topic of  Dealing with Police, Utah Crime News
0comment

Photo: jasonbain

The Salt Lake Tribune recently reported on the use of tasers in Utah.  They analyzed 180 Taser deployments to see the circumstances under each one and found some interesting results:

21% of suspects were fleeing the cops
12% of suspects were ignoring police
39% of suspects resisted without violence by laying on their hands or refused to get out of vehicles.
79% of suspects didn’t have a weapon
73% of suspects were never given a verbal warning

It seems like police are using Tasers as a “quick fix” to getting suspects to calm down.  Rather than verbally warn a suspect or use less dangerous methods to subdue them, police are resorting to currents of electricity to do the dirty work.

It would be one thing of Tasers were used exclusively on suspects who were accused of murder or rape, or if the suspect had a knife and was a serious threat to the safety of the public.  However, a Taser was used against an 11th grader in Logan who ran away from police because he was suspected of carrying alcohol.  Was a Taser really necessary for this non-threatening and minor crime?

Taser use against harmless suspects is dangerous and shouldn’t be allowed.  Officers know nothing of the medical history of a suspect and putting jolts of electricity through their body is dangerous if the person’s health cannot handle it.  Rather than risking the death of the suspect, police should use less dangerous means to subdue a suspect.  Until Tasers are 100% safe, their use should be restricted.

Taser proponents argue that Tasers save lives because police do not have to resort to using traditional firearms.  This is probably true.  But because Taser’s are seen as non-lethal, police officers feel like they can use them more often.  When an officer uses a Taser against an old woman resisting arrest, it should be obvious that this is a problem.

Requiring police to only use Tasers as a substitution for firearms should be the policy of Utah police departments.  This would save lives of suspects, and it would also prevent against situations where Tasers are used against suspects who do not warrant that level of force.

Utah Criminal Question: Should I invite police into my Park City Home?

Jesse Nix, Utah Criminal Defense Lawyer, on the topic of  Dealing with Police, Question
0comment

Q: There was a burglary in my Park City, Utah neighborhood, so police officers were wandering the neighborhood asking people if they saw the burglary suspects or anything suspicious.  When they got to my door, I politely invited them in and even offered them a drink of water.  Then one of the officers tells me that he saw a marijuana joint on my kitchen table and goes to arrest me.  I was like, “what?”  Yeah, I forgot that I left a joint on the table, but I was really nice to these guys and invited them into my home.  Was this legal?

Your first mistake was inviting the cops into your Park City home.  Never, ever do this!  Even if you don’t have anything to hide, police should not be allowed into your home.  You could have talked to them on your front porch rather than inviting them in.  If you wanted to offer them water, you still could have done this on your front porch.

(more…)